Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy

Journal Policies

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy

 
SFREMS

Overview

 

The Sapientia Filipina: Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (SFREMS) recognizes that generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in scholarly research and academic writing. While AI tools may assist researchers in improving productivity and efficiency, they also present important ethical, legal, and academic challenges relating to originality, authorship, transparency, confidentiality, bias, and research integrity.

SFREMS supports the responsible, transparent, and ethical use of AI technologies in research and scholarly communication. Authors remain fully accountable for all content submitted to the journal, regardless of whether AI-assisted tools were used during the research or manuscript preparation process.

 

Principles for Responsible AI Use

 

The use of generative AI should support, rather than replace, scholarly judgment and human intellectual contribution.

Authors are expected to ensure that:

 
AI technologies are used responsibly and ethically;
 
Human researchers retain full control over the research process;
 
AI-generated content is carefully reviewed and verified;
 
Research findings remain accurate, original, and evidence-based;
 
Scholarly integrity is maintained throughout manuscript preparation.

The responsibility for the accuracy, originality, interpretation, and conclusions of a manuscript always rests with the authors.

 

Acceptable Uses of AI

 

SFREMS permits the responsible use of generative AI tools for limited purposes that support manuscript preparation and research activities.

Acceptable uses may include:

 
Improving grammar, spelling, punctuation, and language clarity;
 
Enhancing writing style and readability;
 
Organizing manuscript structure;
 
Translating text, provided the scientific meaning is preserved;
 
Assisting with coding or programming under human supervision;
 
Supporting data visualization;
 
Generating preliminary ideas or outlines that are substantially developed by the authors;
 
Assisting with literature organization or reference management.

All AI-assisted outputs should undergo careful human review before submission.

 

Unacceptable Uses of AI

 

Generative AI must not be used to:

 
Generate fabricated research findings;
 
Create fictitious datasets;
 
Fabricate references or citations;
 
Invent sources that do not exist;
 
Manipulate images or research data in misleading ways;
 
Replace critical scientific analysis or scholarly interpretation;
 
Produce entire manuscripts without substantial human intellectual contribution;
 
Circumvent plagiarism detection or ethical standards;
 
Misrepresent AI-generated content as original human scholarship.

Any use of AI that compromises research integrity constitutes publication misconduct.

 

AI and Authorship

 

Generative AI systems, including large language models and similar technologies, cannot be listed as authors or co-authors of manuscripts submitted to SFREMS.

Artificial intelligence systems cannot:

 
Meet internationally accepted authorship criteria;
 
Accept responsibility for published work;
 
Approve manuscript revisions;
 
Disclose conflicts of interest;
 
Respond to editorial inquiries;
 
Be accountable for research integrity.

Only individuals who satisfy the journal's authorship criteria may be listed as authors.

 

Disclosure of AI Use

 

Authors must disclose the use of generative AI whenever it has made a meaningful contribution to manuscript preparation or research activities.

Disclosure should specify:

 
The name of the AI tool used;
 
The version, where available;
 
The purpose for which it was used;
 
The extent of its contribution.

Appropriate disclosures may be included in the Methods, Acknowledgments, or another appropriate section of the manuscript.

Examples include:

The authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI) to assist with language editing and improve the clarity of the manuscript. All scientific content, analysis, interpretation, and final revisions were independently reviewed and approved by the authors.

or

Generative AI tools were not used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Failure to disclose significant AI use may constitute a breach of publication ethics.

 

Author Responsibilities

 

Authors remain fully responsible for:

 
The originality of the manuscript;
 
Accuracy of all information;
 
Verification of AI-generated content;
 
Proper citation of sources;
 
Compliance with publication ethics;
 
Protection of confidential information;
 
Prevention of plagiarism or fabricated content.

Authors must not rely solely on AI-generated information without independent verification.

 

Confidentiality

 

Authors should exercise caution when using publicly available AI systems.

Unless appropriate safeguards exist, authors should not upload confidential or sensitive materials to AI platforms, including:

 
Unpublished manuscripts;
 
Peer review reports;
 
Confidential participant information;
 
Personal data;
 
Proprietary research data;
 
Institutional documents;
 
Copyright-protected materials without authorization.

Authors remain responsible for protecting confidential information throughout the research and publication process.

 

AI in Peer Review

 

Editors and reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts.

Manuscripts or peer review reports should not be uploaded into publicly accessible generative AI systems if doing so could compromise confidentiality, intellectual property, or participant privacy.

Where AI-assisted editorial tools are used for administrative purposes, their use must not compromise confidential information or replace independent editorial judgment.

Editorial decisions are always made by qualified human editors.

 

AI in Editorial Decision-Making

 

SFREMS may employ AI-assisted technologies to support certain editorial or administrative functions, such as:

 
Similarity screening;
 
Language assessment;
 
Reference verification;
 
Administrative workflow management.

However:

 
AI tools do not determine manuscript acceptance or rejection;
 
Editorial decisions are made solely by qualified editors based on scholarly merit and peer review;
 
Human oversight is maintained throughout the editorial process.
 

Detection of AI Misuse

 

Where concerns arise regarding undisclosed or inappropriate AI use, the Editorial Office may:

 
Request clarification from the authors;
 
Request supporting documentation;
 
Conduct additional editorial review;
 
Seek expert advice where appropriate.

If inappropriate AI use is confirmed, the journal may:

 
Request revision;
 
Reject the manuscript;
 
Publish corrections;
 
Retract published articles;
 
Notify affiliated institutions where appropriate.

Editorial actions will be proportionate to the seriousness of the concern.

 

Commitment to Responsible AI Use

 

The Sapientia Filipina: Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (SFREMS) supports innovation while emphasizing that artificial intelligence should complement—not replace—human scholarship, critical thinking, and ethical research practices. By promoting transparency, accountability, and responsible disclosure of AI use, the journal seeks to ensure that published research remains accurate, trustworthy, original, and ethically produced across all disciplines represented by the journal.

 

Alignment with International Standards

 

This policy has been developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles governing the ethical, transparent, and responsible use of artificial intelligence in scholarly publishing. It is informed by the guidance and recommendations of:

COPE

Committee on Publication Ethics

Position Statement: Authorship and AI Tools · Core Practices

Guidance on the responsible use of AI, authorship, editorial responsibility, confidentiality, and publication ethics.

publicationethics.org →
ICMJE

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work

Guidance on authorship, accountability, transparency, and disclosure of AI-assisted writing.

icmje.org/recommendations →
DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals

Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

Supporting transparent editorial policies, responsible research reporting, and ethical scholarly publishing.

doaj.org/apply/guide →
UNESCO

UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

2021

Establishing internationally recognized principles for the ethical development and use of artificial intelligence, including human oversight, transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and respect for human rights.

unesco.org →
NPC

Republic Act No. 10173 (Data Privacy Act of 2012, Philippines)

Implementing Rules and Regulations

Governing the lawful processing and protection of personal information when AI systems are used in research involving identifiable data.

privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act →

SFREMS periodically reviews and updates this policy to remain aligned with evolving international standards on artificial intelligence, publication ethics, editorial transparency, research integrity, data protection, and responsible open-access scholarly publishing.

Sapientia Filipina  ·  Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies  ·  NIRD