Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
Journal Policies
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
Contents
Overview
The Sapientia Filipina: Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (SFREMS) recognizes that generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly used in scholarly research and academic writing. While AI tools may assist researchers in improving productivity and efficiency, they also present important ethical, legal, and academic challenges relating to originality, authorship, transparency, confidentiality, bias, and research integrity.
SFREMS supports the responsible, transparent, and ethical use of AI technologies in research and scholarly communication. Authors remain fully accountable for all content submitted to the journal, regardless of whether AI-assisted tools were used during the research or manuscript preparation process.
Principles for Responsible AI Use
The use of generative AI should support, rather than replace, scholarly judgment and human intellectual contribution.
Authors are expected to ensure that:
The responsibility for the accuracy, originality, interpretation, and conclusions of a manuscript always rests with the authors.
Acceptable Uses of AI
SFREMS permits the responsible use of generative AI tools for limited purposes that support manuscript preparation and research activities.
Acceptable uses may include:
All AI-assisted outputs should undergo careful human review before submission.
Unacceptable Uses of AI
Generative AI must not be used to:
Any use of AI that compromises research integrity constitutes publication misconduct.
Generative AI systems, including large language models and similar technologies, cannot be listed as authors or co-authors of manuscripts submitted to SFREMS.
Artificial intelligence systems cannot:
Only individuals who satisfy the journal's authorship criteria may be listed as authors.
Disclosure of AI Use
Authors must disclose the use of generative AI whenever it has made a meaningful contribution to manuscript preparation or research activities.
Disclosure should specify:
Appropriate disclosures may be included in the Methods, Acknowledgments, or another appropriate section of the manuscript.
Examples include:
The authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI) to assist with language editing and improve the clarity of the manuscript. All scientific content, analysis, interpretation, and final revisions were independently reviewed and approved by the authors.
or
Generative AI tools were not used in the preparation of this manuscript.
Failure to disclose significant AI use may constitute a breach of publication ethics.
Authors remain fully responsible for:
Authors must not rely solely on AI-generated information without independent verification.
Confidentiality
Authors should exercise caution when using publicly available AI systems.
Unless appropriate safeguards exist, authors should not upload confidential or sensitive materials to AI platforms, including:
Authors remain responsible for protecting confidential information throughout the research and publication process.
AI in Peer Review
Editors and reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts.
Manuscripts or peer review reports should not be uploaded into publicly accessible generative AI systems if doing so could compromise confidentiality, intellectual property, or participant privacy.
Where AI-assisted editorial tools are used for administrative purposes, their use must not compromise confidential information or replace independent editorial judgment.
Editorial decisions are always made by qualified human editors.
AI in Editorial Decision-Making
SFREMS may employ AI-assisted technologies to support certain editorial or administrative functions, such as:
However:
Detection of AI Misuse
Where concerns arise regarding undisclosed or inappropriate AI use, the Editorial Office may:
If inappropriate AI use is confirmed, the journal may:
Editorial actions will be proportionate to the seriousness of the concern.
Commitment to Responsible AI Use
The Sapientia Filipina: Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (SFREMS) supports innovation while emphasizing that artificial intelligence should complement—not replace—human scholarship, critical thinking, and ethical research practices. By promoting transparency, accountability, and responsible disclosure of AI use, the journal seeks to ensure that published research remains accurate, trustworthy, original, and ethically produced across all disciplines represented by the journal.
Alignment with International Standards
This policy has been developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles governing the ethical, transparent, and responsible use of artificial intelligence in scholarly publishing. It is informed by the guidance and recommendations of:
Committee on Publication Ethics
Position Statement: Authorship and AI Tools · Core Practices
Guidance on the responsible use of AI, authorship, editorial responsibility, confidentiality, and publication ethics.
publicationethics.org →International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work
Guidance on authorship, accountability, transparency, and disclosure of AI-assisted writing.
icmje.org/recommendations →Directory of Open Access Journals
Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
Supporting transparent editorial policies, responsible research reporting, and ethical scholarly publishing.
doaj.org/apply/guide →UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
2021
Establishing internationally recognized principles for the ethical development and use of artificial intelligence, including human oversight, transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and respect for human rights.
unesco.org →Republic Act No. 10173 (Data Privacy Act of 2012, Philippines)
Implementing Rules and Regulations
Governing the lawful processing and protection of personal information when AI systems are used in research involving identifiable data.
privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act →SFREMS periodically reviews and updates this policy to remain aligned with evolving international standards on artificial intelligence, publication ethics, editorial transparency, research integrity, data protection, and responsible open-access scholarly publishing.
Sapientia Filipina · Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies · NIRD
