Conflict of Interest

Journal Policies

Conflict of Interest

 
SFREMS

Overview

 

The Sapientia Filipina: Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (SFREMS) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, transparency, impartiality, and accountability throughout the scholarly publishing process. To preserve public trust in published research, all participants in the publication process—including authors, reviewers, editors, Editorial Board members, and journal staff—are required to disclose any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest that could influence, or reasonably be perceived to influence, the conduct, evaluation, interpretation, or publication of scholarly work.

Transparent disclosure enables fair editorial decision-making and safeguards the credibility and independence of the journal.

 

Author Conflict of Interest Declarations

 

Authors must disclose any relationships, affiliations, activities, or financial interests that could influence—or appear to influence—the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, or reporting of their research.

Potential conflicts of interest may include, but are not limited to:

 
Employment or leadership positions in organizations related to the research;
 
Research grants, funding, or sponsorship;
 
Consultancy agreements or advisory roles;
 
Honoraria, speaker fees, or expert testimony;
 
Stock ownership or other financial investments;
 
Patent applications, intellectual property rights, or licensing agreements;
 
Personal, professional, or family relationships that may influence the research;
 
Institutional affiliations that may present competing interests;
 
Membership in advocacy groups or organizations directly related to the research topic;
 
Political, commercial, or ideological interests relevant to the study.

All disclosures should be submitted at the time of manuscript submission and updated promptly if circumstances change during the editorial or publication process.

If no conflicts of interest exist, authors should include the following statement:

“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

 

Reviewer Conflict of Interest

 

Peer reviewers are expected to conduct reviews objectively, independently, and without bias.

Reviewers must decline or withdraw from reviewing a manuscript if they have any actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest that could compromise their impartiality.

Examples include:

 
Current or recent collaboration with any author;
 
Employment at the same institution as an author;
 
Personal, family, or close professional relationships with an author;
 
Academic rivalry or direct competition;
 
Financial interests related to the research;
 
Participation in competing research projects;
 
Any circumstance that could reasonably affect objective evaluation.

Reviewers must promptly notify the Editorial Office if a conflict becomes apparent after accepting a review assignment.

 

Editor Conflict of Interest

 

Editors must perform their editorial responsibilities independently and objectively.

Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts when they have:

 
Personal relationships with any author;
 
Professional collaborations with any author;
 
Financial interests related to the manuscript;
 
Institutional conflicts;
 
Academic competition;
 
Other circumstances that could reasonably compromise editorial impartiality.

When a conflict exists, editorial responsibility will be assigned to another qualified editor.

The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for ensuring that editorial decisions remain free from inappropriate influence.

 

Editorial Board Responsibilities

 

Members of the Editorial Board are expected to uphold the same standards of transparency and impartiality as editors.

Editorial Board members should:

 
Disclose relevant conflicts of interest;
 
Avoid participating in editorial decisions where conflicts exist;
 
Maintain confidentiality throughout the editorial process;
 
Protect the integrity of peer review.
 

Management of Conflicts of Interest

 

The Editorial Office evaluates all disclosed conflicts of interest to determine whether they may affect the integrity of the editorial or peer review process.

Where appropriate, the journal may:

 
Assign alternative editors or reviewers;
 
Request additional disclosures or clarification;
 
Require revisions to disclosure statements;
 
Publish conflict of interest declarations alongside accepted articles;
 
Seek independent expert advice;
 
Implement additional safeguards to preserve editorial independence.

Editorial decisions are based exclusively on scholarly merit and are never influenced by financial, institutional, political, or personal interests.

 

Funding Transparency

 

Authors must disclose all sources of financial support for the research, including:

 
Research grants;
 
Institutional funding;
 
Government funding;
 
Industry sponsorship;
 
Private foundation support;
 
Other financial assistance relevant to the study.

The role of the funding organization in:

 
Study design;
 
Data collection;
 
Data analysis;
 
Interpretation of findings;
 
Manuscript preparation;
 
Publication decisions;

should be clearly described.

If the funding source had no involvement, authors should state this explicitly.

 

Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest

 

Failure to disclose relevant conflicts of interest constitutes a breach of publication ethics.

Where undisclosed conflicts are identified, the journal may:

 
Request additional disclosure;
 
Suspend editorial consideration;
 
Reject the manuscript;
 
Publish a correction or addendum;
 
Issue an expression of concern;
 
Retract the published article when necessary;
 
Notify affiliated institutions or funding agencies where appropriate.

Editorial actions will be proportionate to the seriousness of the omission.

 

Ongoing Disclosure

 

The obligation to disclose conflicts of interest continues throughout the publication process.

Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to inform the Editorial Office promptly if new conflicts arise:

 
During peer review;
 
During revision;
 
Prior to publication;
 
After publication when relevant to the scholarly record.

The journal may update published conflict of interest statements when necessary.

 

Commitment to Transparency

 

The Sapientia Filipina: Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies (SFREMS) is committed to fostering transparency, accountability, and fairness throughout the publication process. By requiring comprehensive conflict of interest disclosures from authors, reviewers, editors, and Editorial Board members, the journal ensures that editorial decisions remain objective, independent, and consistent with internationally recognized standards of publication ethics and research integrity. These practices strengthen the credibility of published research and reinforce public confidence in multidisciplinary scholarship across education, the social sciences, humanities, business, health sciences, engineering, information technology, agriculture, environmental sciences, public administration, and related disciplines.

 

Alignment with International Standards

 

This Conflict of Interest Policy has been developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles of publication ethics, editorial independence, transparency, and responsible scholarly publishing and is aligned with:

COPE

Committee on Publication Ethics

Core Practices

Guidance on conflicts of interest, editorial independence, peer review, and publication ethics.

publicationethics.org →
ICMJE

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work

Recommendations on disclosure of relationships and activities, editorial independence, and conflicts of interest.

icmje.org/recommendations →
DOAJ

Directory of Open Access Journals

Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing

Requirements for transparent conflict of interest policies, editorial governance, and ethical publishing.

doaj.org/apply/guide →

SFREMS periodically reviews and updates this Conflict of Interest Policy to ensure continued alignment with evolving international standards for publication ethics, editorial transparency, research integrity, and responsible open-access scholarly publishing.

Sapientia Filipina  ·  Review of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies  ·  NIRD